Archive for the ‘Cable’ Category

Colbert: Remembering Remembering Michael Jackson

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009


bingo casino direct game online
betting casino las online vegas
betting casino gambling online sports
bet royal online casino bonus codes
beste online casino gids
beste online casino
best usa online casinos
best us online casino bonuses
best us online casino
best uk online casino
best rated online casinos
best rated online casino
best quality casino gambling online 01qq
best payout online casinos
best payout online casino
best paying online craps casino
best paying online casino
best online poker casino
best online casinos slot machines
best online casinos for hawk
best online casinos
best online casino worldwide
best online casino uk
best online casino sports betting
best online casino slots
best online casino sites worldwide
best online casino sites
best online casino guide
best online casino games
best online casino game
best online casino gambling
best online casino directory
best online casino bonuses
best online casino bonus
best online casino and sportsbooks
best online casino and sports books
best online casino and sportbooks
best online casino affiliate program
best online casino
best new online casino
best high payout online casinos
best casino slot online
best casino online
best casino game online site
best casino gambling online play
best casino gambling guide online online portal
best casino deal game online poker
best black casino jack online
bedste online casinos
bedste online casinoer
bedste online casino
beating online casino fraud
beating online casino
atlantis casino game online
atlantic vegas slots online casino
atlantic vegas casino online
atlantic lounge online casino bonus codes
atlantic lounge online casino
atlantic city online casino
asian online casino for mac
asian online casino
are online casinos profitable
anyone win with online casinos
andnot casino gambling online sport
american online casinos that accept money order deposits
all usa online casinos
all online casinos
alderney online casino
affordable casino games online
advertise casino online
add casino online site
a online casino
online slots
online slot
online slot machines
slot machines online
play slots online
online casino slots
casino online slots
online video slots
online slots games
online bonus slots
no download online slots
cleopatra slots online
play slot games online
slots online casinos
online slot machine casino
best online slots
casino game online slot
play casino slot online
online casino slot machines
wheel of fortune slots online
online wheel of fortune slots
play video slots online
uk slots online
play bonus slots online
online wheel of fortune slot
online nickel slots
online gambling slot machines
bingo online slot
online slot casinos
igt slots online
slots gratis online
best casino slot online
online texas tea slots
best online casino slots
online slots for real
price is right slots online
double diamond online slots
casino gambling online poker roulette slot
wheel of fortune slot machine online
new online video slots
newest online slots
online slot review
online penny slot machines
gaia online slots cheats
online slot machiens
online slot games htm
online slot machine games htm
online slot games little green men htm
loose penny slot online
online play casino slot machines
online play for fun casino slot machines
progressive online slots games htm
online no download slot real money
online grand casino slots
penguin pays slot online
online slot maskiner
online slots spil
spring break online slots game
double bucks online slots
play double bucks online slots
online slots net
best online casinos slot machines
use debit card for online slots
online slots accept paypal
rocky slots online
top slots online
phantasy star online armor slots
phantasy star online editing armor slots
deal or no deal online slot machine game
bingo and slots online that most recently opened
bingo online that offers chinese kitchen slot game
best loose slot online
bingo machine online play slot
hee haw slot machine online
real online casino slots
slots onlined
slots online tips for winning
play for fun online video slots
loose video slot online
online casino slot
play slot machine online
slot machine online
online slot machine
online casino slot machine
casino machine online slot
best online slot
best online slots reviews
safest online slots
word slots online game
loose online slot machines
online penny slots
play keno slots online
lil lucy slot online
find slot machine online games for fun
online slots coral reef
aztec temple online slot machines
atlantic vegas slots online casino
online slot gambling
play casino online slot
articles about online slot tournaments
safe online slot sites
online java casino slots
real online vegas slot machines
cash cow online slot machine
press your luck online slots
online bonus slot machines
online bonus round slot machines
real online vegas slots
online slot casino
lobster slots online
lobstermania slots online
super slots online
play slot machines online
bet slots online
online slot machines with play money
beating online slots
slots machies online
hentai online slot games
anime slot machine online
igt slot machines to play online
gift of the gods slot machine online
slots online games
online slot macjine
online slot casino money
online slot casinos no deposit
online slots casinos
online slots casinos payouts
online casinos i slots
seal the deal online slot game
online slots and wheel of fortune
slots of vegas online casino
online casinos with the best slots
online igt slots
slot machine game online
casino links machine online shopping slot slot
money to burn video slot online
play slot words online
play online slot machine
play online slot machine real money
play online slot real money malaysia
how to register for online slot malaysia
country allow to play online slot malaysia
online slot real money malaysia
allow to play malaysia online slot
online slot allow to play malaysia
online slot for malaysia
rf online slot extender
monopoly slots online
super grand monopoly slots online
diamond jewel box online slots
super jackpot party online slots
monopoly super grand hotel slots online
no deposit bonus online slots
play monopoly slots online
play monopoly slot machine game online
double triple stars slot machine online
freeroll online slot ournaments
freeroll online slot tournaments
stinkin rich slot machine game online
frewe online games video slots
frewe online games adult video slots
ali baba slots online game
online slots worldwide
kcrgfree online slots
online tv show game slot machine
village people online slot machines
shrimp maina online slots
play zeus slot machine online
bet progressive slots online
bet progressive hotshots slots online
online slots betting
vip online slots
play progressive slots online
ineractive slots online
interactive slots online
uk slots online download
play munsters slots online
hexbreaker slot online
how to play slots online
bodog online slots
whhel of fortune slot machine online
best online slot payouts
online jackpot party slot machines
vyp online slots
win big money playing casino slots online
play slots online for big cash
instant play online slot
online poker and slot machines
zues slot online
play zues slot online
search for online slots by name
play survivor slot game online
survivor slot online
play ultimate survivor slot online
game cheats for online slots
mgm online slot machine games
igt cleopatra slots online
strip slot games online
gem tiles online slot
seamonkey online slot
play pompei slots online
play pompeii slots online
online roulette
play roulette online
online casino roulette
casino online roulette
live online roulette
european roulette online
european online roulette
how to win at online roulette
online roulette system
online american roulette
casino game online roulette
casino gambling online poker roulette slot
best gambling online roulette
online roulette strategies
play roulette online play money
live dealer online roulette
online roulette calculator
online roulette forums
blog casino online roulette
littlewoods online roulette
online roulette glitches
play online roulette games htm
online roulette spil
virtual roulette online casino gaming
profitable online roulette system
roulette online gaming
secrets of online roulette software
online play roulette
gambling online roulette
online roulette table
online roulette number predictor software
roulette online
online roulette systems
online roulette table limit
online casino roulette spin no bet
online casino roulette pass spin
online european roulette
guide to online roulette
how to cheat at roulette online
usa online roulette
fair online roulette
uk fair online roulette
no limit roulette online 01qq
winning online roulette ilivehere
best online roulette strategies
strategies for online roulette
randomness of online roulette
blackjack online
online blackjack
play blackjack online
best online blackjack
online strip blackjack
online blackjack rules
online blackjack sites
strip blackjack online
online blackjack money
how to win online blackjack
multiplayer online blackjack
online blackjack training
blackjack tournaments online
online elimination blackjack
online blackjack games htm
black jack online blackjack games
top rated online blackjack
online blackjack spil
gratis online blackjack
online blackjack school
online video blackjack gambling casino
casino deposit bonus online casino blackjack
top online casino blackjack
online blackjack game bonus
online blackjack deck
dealing blackjack online
play an online game of blackjack with homer simpson
online gambling blackjack strategy
online casino blackjack software
online casino blackjack tips
blackjack game best online casino
blackjack best online casinos
secrects to playing online blackjack
online blackjack secrets positive betting
naked blackjack online live casino mobile phone harem
blackjack competition online
blackjack casino online
blackjack games online
best odds online blackjack
what is the best online blackjack game to play
learn card counting online blackjack
online casino blackjack
online blackjack secrets
best online odds blackjack
play blackjack online for fun
blackjack odds online casino
blackjack switch strategy online
blackjack online best odds casino
blackjack online casino odds
blackjack online best odds
blackjack forum online
blackjack online practice
winning blackjack online
casinos online blackjack systems
online blackjack game
online blackjack no download or registration
online blackjack learn
online coupon for samsung blackjack smart phone
online blackjack strategy com golden reef casino
best place to play blackjack online
online blackjack webcam
play blackjack for fun online
affordable blackjack online

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Some TV stations refuse to air marijuana-tax advertisement

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Reporting from Sacramento — Advocates for legalizing marijuana have released a new television advertisement calling for the drug to be decriminalized and taxed to help solve California’s budget crunch.

But the controversial topic of pot and taxes has proven too hot for several broadcast affiliates to handle, according to the Marijuana Policy Project, the national pro-pot group that is sponsoring the ad campaign.

KTLA-TV Channel 5 and KABC-TV Channel 7 in Los Angeles were among stations citing concerns about the ad’s content and refusing to put it on the air, said Bruce Mirken, a spokesman for the marijuana advocacy group.

Calls to KTLA and KABC seeking comment were not immediately returned.

The advertisement features what the group calls “an actual California marijuana consumer,” Nadene Herndon of Fair Oaks in suburban Sacramento County. Herndon is shown alone on camera talking about proposed budget cuts to schools, police and state parks, then suggests that Sacramento politicians “are ignoring millions of Californians who want to pay taxes. We’re marijuana consumers.”

Despite the rejections by some stations, Mirken estimates that the ad will run about 200 times in the next week or so.

Attitudes toward recreational marijuana use have been softening in the decade since California voters approved pot for medical use, according to the advocacy group.

Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) this year introduced a bill that would essentially put marijuana in the same regulatory framework as alcohol. It has yet to be reviewed by the Legislature.

By Eric Bailey and Catherine Saillant

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Nielsen: 31.1 million watched Jackson memorial

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

NEW YORK — Some 31.1 million people in the United States watched the Michael Jackson memorial on television, with millions more catching video streams on their computers.

The Nielsen Media Research estimate on Wednesday provided only a slice of the audience for the Los Angeles event. But it did offer insight on how the memorial compared to other events: President Barack Obama’s inauguration in January was seen by 38 million people on TV, and the “American Idol” finale in May had 28.9 million viewers.

Eighteen different networks carried the memorial live, including all the big broadcasters and cable news stations, along with MTV, BET and the three largest Spanish-language stations. It had an audience share of 56, meaning that 56 percent of the televisions turned on during the memorial were tuned into Jackson.

Nielsen does not immediately have an estimate of Jackson’s worldwide audience, a task that could take weeks.

Twelve years ago, 33.2 million people in the U.S. watched Princess Diana’s funeral. That happened early on a Saturday morning, as opposed to the middle of a workday, and people then didn’t have the option of watching it on their computers.

Complete estimates of the Internet audience were not immediately available, but individual Web sites reported some heavy traffic. MSNBC.com said it streamed nearly 19 million videos on Tuesday, a record for the site. Video streamers spent an average of 12 minutes on the site, MSNBC.com reported.

CNN.com said it had 10.5 million live streams, the second busiest day in its history. It streamed nearly 27 million videos on Obama’s inauguration day. ABC News said its Web site had nearly 6 million video streams, with traffic up 70 percent over a typical day.

Nielsen said 3 percent of the online conversations on Tuesday were about the Jackson memorial, the third-highest percentage it has ever seen after the day Jackson died and Obama’s inauguration. Early indications are that Wednesday’s percentage was higher than Tuesday’s, Nielsen said.

The event combined musical moments from the likes of Usher, Jennifer Hudson and Mariah Carey with remembrances from Brooke Shields, Magic Johnson and others. Brief heartfelt remarks by Jackson’s 11-year-old daughter at the end stole the show.

Former President Reagan’s funeral in 2004 was seen by 20.8 million viewers in the daytime hours, but his prime-time burial had an audience of 35.1 million people, Nielsen said. The opening ceremony of last year’s Beijing Olympics had 34.2 million viewers.

Breaking down Tuesday’s audience, CNN and ABC both had 5.3 million viewers for the memorial, Nielsen said. NBC had 5.1 million, CBS had 3.9 million, Fox News Channel had 2.2 million and MSNBC had 1.4 million.

Even for those viewers who watched Tuesday’s Jackson memorial, there was still an appetite for more in prime time. ABC, CBS and NBC each had Jackson specials at 10 p.m. EDT and they had a combined audience of 20.5 million viewers. ABC won bragging rights for its Elizabeth Vargas-hosted hour focused on Jackson’s children, with a leading 8.6 million viewers.

By David Bauder

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

New Live Poll Allows Pundits To Pander To Viewers In Real Time

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Cable news networks sink to new depths: Nonstop coverage of Jackson’s death is excessive, fawning

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

You can, quite obviously, argue both sides of the assertions of Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., that Michael Jackson was “a pervert, a child molester and a pedophile.” Although to pretend that there aren’t a lot of people out there who agree with King would be naive.

But it would be difficult to argue with King’s argument — posted in a video clip on YouTube — that media coverage of Jackson’s death has been excessive. Or that much of it has indeed been “glorifying” the entertainer.

Has the coverage been excessive? Certainly. The 24-hour news channels came close to becoming 24-hour Michael Jackson-is-dead channels.

As is so often the case, with nothing new to report, CNN, FNC and MSNBC just kept repeating the same “news” over and over again.

As the days passed and the coverage didn’t diminish, I couldn’t help but puckishly ask people if they could check the TV to see if Michael Jackson was still dead.

My current-events obsessed teenagers, who spend more time watching the 24-hour news channels than I do, stopped watching for several days because they were so sick of hearing about Jackson.

It is, no doubt, a generational thing to some extent. To them, Jackson was a has-been whose biggest success came years before they were born.

I was about their age when Elvis Presley died, and (at the time) knew him only as a has-been who made bad movies. And, even though that was years before the advent of 24-hour cable news networks, I remember thinking the media coverage was excessive.

And it’s not just the congressman who thinks that television journalism has become an oxymoron.

“Daily Show” host Jon Stewart dubbed the coverage of Jackson’s death “obitu-tainment” — and he was absolutely right. It was just the latest and greatest example of how television news has become all “Entertainment Tonight,” all the time.

Last week on his Comedy Central show, Stewart embarrassed TV “news” people over and over again, simply by showing clips of their coverage. It culminated with a clip of “Good Morning America” in which Robin Roberts promised viewers “the first video of the room where Michael Jackson went into cardiac arrest.”

“After that, we’ll have an exclusive look at the room where news also died,” Stewart said. “Unfortunately, it’s the same room.”

Well, TV news died long before Jackson did.

As with all things television, however, the fault lies not just with the cable news networks but with ourselves. If American viewers weren’t watching the Jackson coverage, it wouldn’t be as excessive as it is.

For the umpteenth time, let me remind you that these are for-profit businesses. They make their money by attracting viewers and then selling commercial time to advertisers interested in reaching those viewers.

It’s like any bad show on TV. If people don’t watch, it will go away. If they do watch, we’re stuck with it.

That does not, however, excuse the tone of the coverage. King was on the mark when he said the late singer was being glorified.

Whatever you think of Jackson as an entertainer and a human being, the fact is that the child molestation charges are part of his legacy.

In 1993, he did indeed settle out of court — for a reported $20 million — one such allegation. A decade later, he gave an interview to ABC in which he talked about taking young boys to bed with him — all very innocent, Jackson asserted, but astonishingly creepy nonetheless.

Two years later, he was acquitted on charges he molested one of the boys who was seen in that ABC program.

Reporting on his life and playing down those aspects of it is sort of like reporting on Richard Nixon’s life and ignoring the Watergate scandal.

And yet, at times, it has been suggested on air that it’s not an appropriate subject. When attorney Gloria Allred — not one of my favorite people — dared to raise it as part of what Jackson will be remember for, pop-culture commentator Toure interrupted, insisting that it was an inappropriate topic.

Inappropriate for fans, but certainly not inappropriate for journalists.

But then we’ve already decided that the cable news networks are far more concerned about ratings and advertising than they are with anything resembling journalism.

– By Scott D. Pierce
E-mail: pierce@desnews.com

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Honduras new government is censoring journalists

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — At the close of the one of this week’s nightly news broadcasts, Channel 21 news anchor Indira Raudales made a plea: “We have a right to information! This can’t be happening in the 21st century!”

If Raudales offered more details, viewers did not hear them: the screen briefly went to static.

Her on-air appeal for freedom of the press came as the newly installed Honduran government kept several news outlets closed, detained international reporters, and periodically interrupted the signal of CNN en español.

Reporters for The Associated Press were taken away in military vehicles and Venezuela’s Telesur network — and any other station supportive of toppled president Manuel Zelaya — are still off the air.

Stations that are broadcasting carry only news friendly to the new government. Several local papers have yet to publish information about Zelaya’s international support in neighboring countries.

”They militarized Channel 36, which is owned by me,” said Esdras López, director of the show, ”Asi se Informa.” “They brought more than a battalion — 22 armed men — took the channel and said nobody could come in and nobody could come out.

“I own this building!”

The crackdown on the media began before dawn Sunday, when hooded soldiers entered the presidential palace by force and captured Zelaya, a leftist firebrand who had vowed to defy the supreme court, congress and the attorney general’s office in a quest to hold a referendum. The nation’s media went black while Zelaya was flown out of the country.

When a new government presided by former head of Congress Roberto Micheletti was installed a few hours later, only the radio and TV stations loyal to the establishment were allowed to broadcast.

Citing a daily newspaper, the InterAmerican Press Association reported that Zelaya supporters in Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula attacked reporters and photographers, as well as destroyed newspaper-vending kiosks. The advocacy group also reported that soldiers stormed into a TV station and newspaper newsrooms, ordering a halt to operations.

”We are deeply concerned by reports that several broadcasters have been taken off the air,” said Committee To Protect Journalists’ Americas senior program coordinator Carlos Lauría. “We call on those in power to allow the resumption of all broadcasts and ensure that all journalists can work freely and safely at this critical time for Honduras.”

López said his station was targeted because of his past critical coverage of Micheletti and Gen. Romeo Vásquez, the head of the armed forces.

”There are journalists who Zelaya paid to insult me morning, noon and night,” said National Human Rights Commissioner Ramón Custodio López. “There is no censorship in Honduras. We have simply asked the media not to feed the conflict. The media that are closed are the ones that were feeding hate.”

Custodio, the government ombudsman, said he has not received any complaints from the press.

”If I get a complaint, I will investigate it,” he said.

If news outlets are leaving out chunks of the story, Custodio said, it’s because they have the right to publish only the information that interests them.

”Who are we supposed to turn to when the government human rights commissioner is justifying this coup?” said Andrés Molina, a correspondent for Venezuela’s Telesur network, which is off the air. “The military picked up our reporters off the street and held them for two hours. Later they said it was a mistake. How can it be a mistake, when these people are going around with cameras, microphones and media credentials?”

He stressed that Telesur is often criticized for being a ”leftist station out of Caracas” but “how then do you explain that they are taking CNN off the air too?”

”This is not ideology,” he said. “This is abuse.”

Micheletti’s spokesman René Zepeda, himself a longtime journalist here, told reporters that if it were his decision, all stations would be broadcasting. The Zelaya administration’s channel 8, he said, would return after consultation with lawyers.

A 2008 report by the Open Society Institute said government payments to the press were widespread. A report by the InterAmerican Dialogue think tank in Washington said the Honduran media operate as arms of political parties.

”One of the largest threats to Honduran democracy is the lack of independence of the Honduran media,” according to the paper written by Manuel Orozco and Rebecca Rouse. “The media have failed to fulfill their social function as government watchdogs, are controlled by business and political interests and do not practice fair reporting practices.”

By Frances Robles

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Q2 Cable Ratings: FNC Dominance; Up Across the Board; 10 Top Shows

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

Fox News Channel continued its ratings dominance in the just concluded second quarter. Compared to Q2 ‘08 FNC is up an astonishing 33% among Total Viewers and up 44% in the A25-54 demo in Total Day (Monday-Sunday). In primetime (Monday-Friday) the numbers are even more impressive: up 35% in Total Viewers and up 54% in younger viewers. FNC is on-track to have the highest rated year in the network’s 13 year history.

In primetime, Fox News has more Total Viewers and younger viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined.

Fox News occupies the Top 10 spots on cable news among Total Viewers:

8pm – O’Reilly Factor — 3,188,000
9pm – Hannity — 2,341,000
5pm – Glenn Beck — 2,053,000
10pm – On the Record — 1,950,000
6pm – Special Report — 1,889,000
7pm – Fox Report — 1,757,000
11pm – O’Reilly Factor — 1,579,000
9am – America’s Newsroom — 1,399,000
4pm – Your World — 1,389,000
3pm – Studio B — 1,169,000

Fox News is the #3 basic cable network in primetime – behind USA and TNT. CNN is #23 and MSNBC is #25.

More details on show-by-show growth, after the jump…

4pm: Your World
Total Viewers: (1,389,000 viewers) +47%
25-54: (292,000) viewers) +66%

5pm: Glenn Beck
Total Viewers: (2,053,000 viewers) +110%
25-54: (515,000 viewers) +172%

6pm: Special Report
Total Viewers: (1,889,000 viewers) +41%
25-54: (427,000 viewers) +53%

7pm: The FOX Report
Total Viewers: (1,757,000 viewers) +38%
25-54: (447,000 viewers) +57%

8pm: O’Reilly Factor
Total Viewers: (3,188,000 viewers) + 31%
25-54: (734,000 viewers) +50%

9pm: Hannity
Total Viewers: (2,341,000 viewers) + 33%
25-54: (599,000 viewers) + 50%

10pm: On the Record
Total Viewers: (1,950,000 viewers) +45%
25-54: 510,000 viewers) +61%

By Media Bistro

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Power players: MSNBC and Fox News

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

The two cable news networks are seeing ratings gains
By Toni Fitzgerald

The presidential election may be long over, but partisan politics are still thriving on cable news, and winning.

Right-leaning Fox News Channel and left-leaning MSNBC continue to build on last year’s huge ratings increases, a year after their viewership began surging during the presidential primary season.

By contrast, CNN, known as the most balanced of the three major cable news networks and the one that saw the biggest increases during the presidential race, has seen ratings decline.


This only confirms what Fox News established years ago when it first shot past CNN: When it comes to ratings, taking sides will always trump solid and fair reporting, as much as Americans may say they appreciate it.


It’s a lesson MSNBC has since come to appreciate after years of foundering.

During February, Fox News Channel’s primetime viewership jumped 29 percent year to year, from 1.88 million to 2.41 million total viewers. MSNBC was up 23 percent, from 773,000 to 951,000. CNN, meanwhile, declined 31 percent, from 1.67 million to 1.16 million.

Among adults 25-54, Fox News’ key demographic, the network surged 21 percent, from 455,000 to 551,000. MSNBC, meanwhile, was up just 3 percent in that demo but saw huge gains among adults 18-34, where Barack Obama performed quite strongly last November.

MSNBC’s 18-34 average rose 21 percent year to year, from 111,000 to 138,000. CNN was down in both demographics.

Both FNC and MSNBC owe their gains to the post-election squabbling in Congress.


Long identified with the right, despite its “fair and balanced” tagline, FNC owes much to Obama’s election in November, which has allowed it to galvanize its viewership in a way that the latter years of President George W. Bush’s tenure did not.

Obama and his $790 billion stimulus plan have given conservative primetime hosts Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity something of real substance to rail against, and they’ve always been at their best, and the most fun, fuming over liberal malfeasances of the sort the plan represents. They were at their worst when patting their president on the back.

MSNBC, after swinging sharply to the left over the past 18 months, has risen in this post-election period rallying viewers behind Obama. The addition of Air America host Rachel Maddow to primetime has sparked huge ratings increases, especially among the young college students and recent graduates, who helped get Obama elected.

No doubt these gains will continue over the coming months too, as the recession plays out and Republicans and Democrats continue their very partisan debate over how to reenergize the economy.

***

Meanwhile, in other cable ratings for the week ended Feb. 22:

Top five networks in primetime (18-49s): USA, TBS, TNT, ESPN, A&E.

Top five networks in primetime (total viewers): USA, Fox News Channel, TNT, TBS, ESPN.

Top movie (18-49s): TNT’s “Ocean’s Eleven” (Saturday, 8 p.m.) 1.40 million.

Top sporting event (total viewers): ESPN’s “College Basketball: Pittsburgh/Connecticut” (Monday, 7 p.m.) 2.54 million.

Shows making the top 10 among 18-34s, 18-49s and 25-54s: USA’s “WWE Raw” (Monday, 9 and 10 p.m.); Bravo’s “Top Chef” (Wednesday, 10 p.m.).

Show on the rise: MTV’s “America’s Best Dance Crew,” Thursday 10 p.m. The dance competition jumped 16 percent week-to-week among 18-34s, from 1.16 million to 1.35 million.

Show on the decline: Comedy Central’s “Important Things with Demetri Martin,” Wednesday 10:30 p.m. The comedy fell 47 percent week-to-week among viewers 18-34, from 1.4 million to 749,000.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

The Next Great Media War

Monday, January 5th, 2009

Who will win the battle between content providers like Viacom and distributors like Time Warner Cable? Viewers, of course.

The New Year’s Eve drama between Time Warner Cable and Viacom was the opening salvo in what promises to be a long and brutal battle for the future of our major media companies. It’s media’s version of the Hatfields and McCoys: Content vs. Distribution. Who should make more money?

At stake is how content creators will be compensated and control over the relationship with the consumer of that content. How this plays out could have a major impact on which companies own the future of media.

Based on last week’s dramatic showdown, we’re seeing the beginning of the shift of power from the companies that deliver content (broadcast networks, cable systems, satellite systems, etc.) to the companies that create and own it.

Large media companies will be watching as customers change their consumption habits, advertising revenues drop, and creative talent goes in a hundred directions.

 

This is all your fault of course. You, the consumer, empowered by all kinds of new technologies–from iPods and iPhones to Hulu and Slingbox–have begun to expect that you can view video programming whenever, wherever, and however you want to. And naturally, you want to be the judge of what content is good and how much you’re willing to pay for it.

This is what the Internet does. It eliminates middlemen. If you live in California and you want to buy a sweater from a boutique in New York, you go their website and buy it. Forget having to find the one store in your state that might carry that sweater, or poring over catalogues hoping to find it. Those days are gone. And at some point, many of those businesses in the middle may be gone, too.

That’s what is beginning to happen to content—the middleman is disappearing. But the fact that all video will be available on the Internet doesn’t mean everyone will see everything. In fact, it could mean that it will be even harder for programming to distinguish itself or even get the chance to be seen by large audiences. There just isn’t enough time for you to check out everything on the web, meaning companies that know how to package and market video content for you will still exist. And it will still be more efficient to deliver some programming, like live sports and mass market programming, down one-way delivery systems like cable and satellite. So networks and cable systems will exist and control some of what we see.

But as the business models for the new digital platforms – Internet, satellite, telephone–evolve, they will create opportunities for new forms of advertising or methods for consumers to pay directly for content (iTunes, etc.). In the end, the power of the good content providers should continue to grow in this equation.

That’s a huge change. Historically, the distribution platforms have played the dominant role in controlling what programming you would see on your TV. First the broadcast networks dominated because so few were licensed. Then the cable systems grew in power because once you became a cable customer, then everything you viewed on your TV came through that pipeline.

But if that cable system didn’t want to carry your programming, they didn’t have to. As they grew and picked up significant percentages of the viewers in a particular market, their leverage with the programmers grew. What cable and satellite systems carry isn’t only based on audience acceptance. It’s about their business. If one content player demanded more money from the cable company than another, it didn’t always get to you. Try to find the NFL Network on your cable system.

Still, we assume that most systems wanted to keep their price as attractive as possible so they aren’t thrilled with anything that raises the price to their consumers, especially if they don’t get that extra money.

With the advent of first satellite TV and now the Internet, the power is beginning to shift. Suddenly the cable system isn’t the only way you can get robust digital programming into your home. You can install a satellite dish from one of two major players – DirecTV and the Dish Network – and they will bring you hundreds of channels. And, in a growing number of markets you can get a competitive digital television service from your phone company – particularly Verizon and AT&T.

Of course, now much of today’s programming is also showing up online, where it can be viewed in several places by someone with no TV hookup at all. There are a growing number of people pulling the plug on either satellite or cable and getting all their TV programming from the web.

That brings us to last week’s face off.

Viacom threatened to pull its 19 cable TV networks—including Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, and MTV—off Time Warner Cable systems, serving 13.3 million people around the country, at midnight on New Year’s Eve if Time Warner didn’t agree to increase its payments to Viacom by between 22 percent and 36 percent per channel according Marketwatch.com.

Viacom is king of the content side, with roughly 25 percent of all cable viewers watching their networks during the day. On the other hand, ratings of the Viacom channels on Time Warner Cable are down—fewer people are watching those (and many other) channels than last year. So if the content you are producing is less relevant, why should you get more?

Meanwhile, Time Warner Cable’s parent company, Time Warner, is the second largest provider of content, with 16 percent of all viewing on cable on their various networks (CNN, HBO etc). So it’s on both sides of this issue, and on the programming side it’s Viacom’s major competitor.

Viacom already received about $300 million from Time Warner Cable, according to BernsteinResearch, but that’s only about 2.8 percent of TWC’s overall video revenue. And since they are providing a quarter of what is actually being viewed on that cable system, Viacom wanted a bigger slice.

Truth be told, Viacom had a lot less to lose than in the past because it now has new ways to get its programming to its audience via the Internet, satellite and through the phone companies.

So it wasn’t a surprise when the details of the deal started to trickle out. According to nytimes.com: “An executive with knowledge of the negotiation said that Time Warner had given in and agreed to pay a higher fee to MTV Networks.”

And according to the Wall Street Journal’s reporting, the major concession Time Warner Cable got from the new deal related entirely to its attempt to tap into the new digital revenue streams. It will be allowed to put some Viacom programs up earlier on TWC’s own video-on-demand service.

But both are merely incremental moves on the seismic shift that is violently shaking up the media world today. The changes coming are so dramatic and widespread they will be hard to keep up with, both for businesses and consumers.

Just as you will struggle over which new devices to buy and use—iPhone or BlackBerry Storm?—media companies will struggle with how to create and pay for content in a world changing so quickly that no one knows how to get it paid for.

At the same time the large media companies will be watching as customers change their consumption habits, advertising revenues drop, and creative talent goes in a hundred directions.

If this was football, it would be like changing the field, the ball, the number of players and the rules at the same time. Maybe we could even throw in a BCS Playoff system to decide who wins.

Larry Kramer is senior adviser at Polaris Venture Partners, a national venture capital firm. He served as the first president of CBS Digital Media. Prior to joining CBS, Kramer was chairman, CEO, and founder of MarketWatch, Inc. Kramer spent more than 20 years in journalism as a reporter and editor at The San Francisco Examiner, The Washington Post, and The Times of Trenton.

– by Larry Kramer

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Can Obama Cure TV’s Blitzeritis?

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

My mother is a wonderful person, and as her fourth child, I’m grateful she didn’t stick to her guns and quit after three. Yet she also epitomizes a crazy-making side effect of modern TV news that consistently exalts the trivial — a condition I’ve labeled Blitzeritis, or behaving like a Moran.

Ask mom about John McCain and she’ll say he’s too old and looks it. Barack Obama is too thin. Hillary Clinton’s husband is a philanderer, Mitt Romney’s wife is a very nice-looking woman, and Al Gore is a bright guy who she now wishes were president, except that kid of his keeps getting into trouble.

Hearing her recite political figures’ shortcomings — invariably fixating upon their most superficial attributes –is like listening to Goldilocks if she focused not on the porridge but the color of the bowls in which it was served.

In harboring this little tic, mom is very much in tune with the cable-news networks, which combine obsessive horserace analysis with the probing depth of Us magazine.

Anchors, correspondents and regular pundits (an increasingly in-bred menagerie) are thus decidedly ill-equipped to deal with intricate or nuanced ideas. Producers and hosts are rather preprogrammed to unleash the ideological attack dogs from both sides, then simply tear at a thing until it stops moving.

As for the fascination with the inconsequential, a Fox News panel actually spent several minutes the other day analyzing New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s newly grown beard. If mom still looked like a cheerleader and was willing to squeeze into a questionably short skirt, she’d have fit right in.

Democratic contender Obama threw a wrench into this automated machinery with his landmark speech last week about race in America. Failing to speak in readily digestible sound bites, he temporarily flummoxed TV’s chattering class, which sounded relieved to retreat to more familiar terrain — sexual peccadilloes among politicians (the governor! A mayor! Another governor!); the campaign’s who’s up/who’s down bookkeeping (plus or minus 4 percent); and round if arbitrary milestones (4,000 U.S. soldiers dead in Iraq) that can be pontificated upon from the customary angles by the usual suspects.

The Project for Excellence in Journalism neatly summarized the Obama coverage, saying that “perhaps the most intriguing element was watching the media culture try to deal with a speech that was so complex it defied the TV panel debate, the skills of the veteran political writer or the parameters of a 90-second nightly news segment.”

It’s not surprising the subsequent discussion triggered blowback even within news organizations, such as Fox News’ Chris Wallace publicly scolding the channel’s hosts on “Fox & Friends” — a trio that will never be confused with Harvard’s debating society — for truncating an Obama follow-up comment to the point of distortion, accentuating the negative spin.

Then again, Fox News has consciously adopted an aggressive talk-radio-on-TV approach (and MSNBC has opportunistically moved to counter Fox), which is why this piece began by singling out anchors from CNN and “Nightline,” news entities that should reasonably be expected to aim for a higher level of sobriety and don’t. Their transgressions reside not in philosophical bias but the emptiness of their blustery rhetoric.

Granted, doing live TV is tantamount to flying without a net and merits some slack; still, that’s no excuse for the lobotomy performed on ABC’s latenight mag under a tri-anchor format including Terry Moran or the relentless banality of CNN’s “The Situation Room,” where Wolf Blitzer’s interviews often seem to ignore the answers in his quest for urgency and volume.

Perhaps that’s why Obama’s speech was so bracing — not strictly for its content but the candidate’s refusal to bow to cable news conventions. Win or lose, he was almost saying, I’m going to assume the public is smarter than the general tenor of TV’s political discourse would have you believe.

Whether he’s ultimately rewarded for that gamble remains to be seen, but for now there’s little cause for optimism, as cable news continues to exhibit a bad case of Blitzeritis. And while my mother recommends chicken soup as a magical cure-all for the body, it appears far too late to remedy the chronic shallowness that’s saturated TV’s soul.

– By Brian Lowry

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Primaries Pump News Networks

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

The results of Tuesday’s primary battles may be causing angst among some Democrats, but the resurgence of Sen. Hillary Clinton in Ohio and Texas came as welcome news to the cable news outlets.

Clinton’s wins in key states ensures that the ratings-grabbing spectacle of the fierce competish between her and Sen. Barack Obama to win their party’s nomination will run high for at least another few months or so leading into the Democratic convention in August.

The Clinton-vs.-Obama express has definitely been good for business at CNN and MSNBC. Those two nets came in Nos. 1 and 2 in the key adults 25-54 news demographic in primetime on Tuesday night, with CNN averaging 1.6 million viewers in that age group to MSNBC’s 876,000 and Fox News’ 830,000.

CNN led in total viewers in primetime with an average of 3.7 million viewers, followed by Fox News (3 million) and MSNBC (2 million).

CNN’s D.C. bureau chief David Bohrman found himself stunned, and of course pleased, by the strong viewer turnout for Tuesday’s primaries, which were anything but decided even hours after the polls closed.

“For the last couple of months, I’ve been convinced that the huge spike in viewership was people who were trying to make up their minds and vote,” said Bohrman. “The thing is, most people have voted, and they’re still here. Now it’s translated into this must-watch event.”

So are the nets planning more ratings-fueling debates? In the words of MSNBC principal Phil Griffin, “Yes, yes, and yes.” Griffin and his opposite numbers at CNN are hoping that renewed uncertainty will result in candidates mixing it up for the cameras, and both nets are planning to expand coverage over the next few months, though they admit to being stretched a little thin.

“You plan as best you can the year before,” said Bohrman, “but I don’t think we really expected it would keep going like this. People have been working 100%, and they’re going to keep working 100%. There are not a lot of vacations being taken right now.”

Every working stiff in TV news knows the timetable by heart: Mississippi is next week, then there’s a brief lull before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary, then a primary every week in May, followed by a campaigning free-for-all until the August convention.

Griffin is hoping MSNBC can use the period of increased interest to seize the moment and build its own viewership. “CNN’s been around for a while,” he observed. “They’ve got people who have grown up with CNN, and it’s going to be tough to pry those people away, so we need to pull in the younger viewers.”

Fox execs were unavailable for comment, but the company has said repeatedly in the past that spikes for the competition generated by debates and primaries can last only so long. In weeks without big election news, such as last week, Fox News continues to maintain its edge over the competish.

— By Sam Thielman

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Television Analysts Anticipated A Clinton Win In Ohio

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

The 24-hour cable news channels called Ohio for Hillary Rodham Clinton at 10:55 p.m. The projection was framed as a long foregone conclusion by Brit Hume on Fox News almost at the same second that MSNBC and CNN put Ohio in the win column for Clinton.

Local Cleveland stations were more cautious, reporting that the cable channels had declared Clinton the victor. But during the wait for results from Ohio, TV’s political pundits and prognosticators did everything they could to suggest a Clinton victory.

Looking at the exit poll breakdowns, veteran analyst Bob Schieffer told CBS anchor Katie Couric during the 6:30 p.m. newscast that it “was not good news for Barack Obama.” It set the tone for the night’s coverage.

The specter of the disastrously premature projection on election night 2000 hangs over TV campaign coverage, so news operations were careful not to make too quick a call for the key battleground states of Ohio or Texas. “Too close to call” remained the rule for much of the night.

Although stressing caution and focusing on exit polls, the news teams clearly were looking beyond what Fox News was calling Super Tuesday II.

Unanimity typically is difficult to find among TV’s many political analysts. But behind all the talk was a strong sense that Super Tuesday II would be a super rebound day for Clinton. Reporting from Columbus, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell said that “the mood is as good as it has been” in a long time in the Clinton campaign. MSNBC’s Chris Matthews predicted that, before the night was over, the Ohio results would trigger a shower of celebratory confetti on Clinton.

Fox News, MSNBC and CNN were quick to call Vermont for Obama and Republican candidate John McCain the second the polls closed there. They also called Ohio for McCain after the polls closed here at 7:30 p.m., although later reporting that some polls in Cuyahoga County had been ordered to stay open.

Locally, WOIO Channel 19 was the only station cutting to news coverage when CNN called Ohio for McCain at 7:30 p.m. and when McCain declared victory at 9:47 p.m. But with WJW Channel 8’s regular newscast starting at 10 p.m., WKYC Channel 3 and WEWS Channel 5 aired primary specials at that time. Channel 19 stayed with the 10-11 “Jericho,” although its sister station, WUAB Channel 43, aired its regular newscast at that time.

Each of the national news operations had an Ohio presence. Couric anchored the CBS coverage from Columbus. ABC’s Charles Gibson was in Texas, but the network had Kate Snow reporting from Columbus. And Mitchell reported for NBC and MSNBC from Columbus.

Fox News had Jeff Goldblatt in Cleveland, reporting on the new ballots. MSNBC had Ron Allen and CNN had Jim Acosta stationed in Cleveland.

Cable was the place for political junkies at 9:15 p.m. when the Rhode Island race was called for Clinton and Mike Huckabee dropped out of the Republican race. The local stations still were airing entertainment programs.

Best toy of the evening: the clear winner was CNN reporter John King’s high-tech touch-screen showing states, counties and projected delegate totals.

– By Mark Dawidziak

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

FCC OKs Murdoch Asset-Swap Deal

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

Federal regulators on Monday approved a long-pending deal allowing News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch to swap his controlling interest in satellite broadcaster DirecTV Group Inc. for a larger stake in his own company.

News Corp.’s 38.4% stake in El Segundo-based DirecTV goes to former cable executive John Malone and his holding company Liberty Media Corp. Liberty also gets $550 million in cash and Fox’s regional cable sports networks in Seattle, Denver and Pittsburgh in exchange for its 16.3% equity stake in News Corp.

The deal had been in the works since 2004 as Murdoch sought to consolidate his hold on News Corp.

“Rupert Murdoch doesn’t want anybody controlling that much of the stock,” said Larry Witt, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc.

The deal, which is tax-free because it involves a swap of assets, amounts to a large share repurchase by News Corp., he said. Liberty’s stake in News Corp. is valued at about $11 billion.

The Justice Department still must give its approval.

The Federal Communications Commission approved the deal with some conditions, saying that “the public interest benefits of the transfer outweighed the potential harms.”

Liberty agreed to abide by arbitration provisions involving regional sports networks and the ability to retransmit broadcast stations that were imposed on News Corp. when the FCC approved its acquisition of DirecTV from Hughes Electronics Corp. in 2003.

Also, the FCC ordered that Liberty must end its common ownership of cable TV operations and DirecTV in Puerto Rico within one year either by reducing its ownership stake or selling one of the assets.

Liberty adds DirecTV to entertainment investments that include interests in home shopping channel QVC, Starz Entertainment, Time Warner and IAC/InterActiveCorp.

FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein, a Democrat, dissented on part of the decision, complaining that DirecTV still does not provide access to local broadcast TV stations in “scores of markets” nationwide.

But he and fellow Democrat Michael J. Copps, who both oppose more media consolidation, said they supported the transfer of DirecTV to Liberty because it would lessen News Corp.’s holdings.

“The question here is whether we should approve the transfer of assets from one giant media conglomerate to a marginally-less-giant media conglomerate,” Copps said. “Once consummated, the transaction will result in a measure of de-consolidation and somewhat less vertical integration.”

– By Jim Puzzanghera

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Yes, The Strike Was Worth It

Monday, February 11th, 2008

Let’s not kid ourselves. This town is so desperate to get back to work it’s like that girl auditioning on “American Idol” last week, who would have gladly given Simon Cowell her dog if he’d just put her through to Hollywood.

Well, three-plus months of unemployment can strike the fear of Peter Chernin into anyone. With the Writers Guild of America leaders claiming a “huge victory” on Sunday and recommending that members ratify a new three-year agreement with studios and networks, it looks as if the 14-week writers strike could be over as soon as Wednesday. In fact, many top TV producers will be back at the grind as you read this (OK, some never really stopped, but that’s another story).

Before the euphoria fades and the contractual details of the deal are forgotten like last Sunday’s Super Bowl score, though, it’s an appropriate time to ask: Was it worth it? Did guild leaders gain enough yardage to justify effectively shutting down the TV business and damaging the film industry, putting tens of thousands of people out of work as recession clouds darken on the horizon?

In a word, yes. Against formidable odds, some well-earned skepticism and endless carping from nonwriting workers who viewed themselves as collateral damage in a provincial border war, guild officials stuck to their guns and negotiated a contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers that, while maybe not a historic win for labor, improves some terms from the recent Directors Guild of America contract, offers a blueprint for future payouts on digital media and even eases some of the pain of the oft-lamented 1988 contract, in which writers failed to achieve their objectives despite a five-month walkout.

“It’s the best deal we could have gotten under the circumstances,” Howard A. Rodman, a screenwriter and member of the guild’s board of directors, told me Sunday. “It accomplished the main goal we wanted when we set out on strike, which was that as the business shifted from television sets and movies to new media, we wouldn’t be left behind. And we got that.”

The main advance for the writers comes in the area of residual payments for material broadcast over the Internet and other digital media. As the market for network TV reruns ebbs, industry players expect Web streaming to start spitting out cash in coming years. The writers were especially sensitive about this issue because they believe they were shafted out of millions of dollars in DVD revenue as a result of home-video deals made during the 1980s.

The DGA agreed to a flat fee for material used on the Web, but the writers, in the third year of their contract, will get something far better: a percentage of the distributor’s gross receipts. Why does this matter? First, it’s proportional. On the off chance that Web streaming does explode into a commercial leviathan, writers will reap the benefits, as opposed to collecting a fee that could wind up looking like a consolation prize. And more important, writers will be paid off the gross that’s actually connected to a retailer’s price — say, the $1.99 iTunes charges for a TV episode — as opposed to the less-impressive “producer’s gross,” which entails complicated formulas that require a platoon of accountants to unpack.

As Rodman put it, “If everybody trusted everyone else’s bookkeeping, fine.” But as anyone who’s followed the glorious history of Hollywood “net-profit” deals knows, people who don’t have good contracts with airtight terms usually wind up in tears or in court.

Now, all of this does not mean that the tentative agreement is nirvana for Hollywood’s scribe tribe. Some guild dissenters are already attacking a provision that says the studios don’t have to pay any residual on streamed content for up to 24 days after its initial airing. This term exists because the studios don’t want to have to fork over cash every time a DVR user queues up a show a week or two after its original airdate. But critics say it gives the studio bosses a significant loophole to exploit.

Nor does the deal extend to jurisdiction over reality and animation writers, which Patric Verrone, president of the guild’s West Coast branch, had promised members would be in the next contract. Many in the guild say officials merely used the issue as a stalking horse for the much more vital area of new-media residuals.

But if the guild is really serious about expanding its membership — as it seems to be — then it will need to engage in the arduous work of unionizing reality and animated shows one by one and also make moves toward mending relations with its sister guilds, AFTRA (American Federation of Television and Radio Artists) and IATSE (International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees), which were seriously damaged in this strike.

Most important, once the relief and giddiness of the strike’s end pass, TV writers in particular are going to confront an altered landscape. There may not be as many opportunities as in the past, and those that remain may simply not be as lucrative, with or without residual payments.

“The TV business will be a different business going forward,” said Jonathan Taplin, a digital media specialist and USC adjunct professor. “It will be slimmed down; there will be less pilots being commissioned and made. It’s just going to be a tighter business.”

Exactly what that will look like, only time will tell. But it’s a safe bet that people who ply their trade on Final Draft aren’t going to go obsolete any time soon.

For now, the important thing to remember is that for the first time in a very long time, a Hollywood craft union struck for an important set of principles and actually came back from the bargaining table with something worth talking about.

Here’s something else: This strike’s almost over! Relax.

Uh, just don’t relax too much. Did we mention the Screen Actors Guild contract expires in less than four months?

– By Scott Collins

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

Hollywood Focuses On Fast End To Long Strike

Friday, February 8th, 2008

Hollywood could be back on its feet as early as Monday.

The major studios and the Writers Guild of America are putting the finishing touches on a deal that could bring an end to the costly walkout. Today the two sides are expected to finalize a three-year contract that guild leaders plan to present to thousands of writers in Los Angeles and New York on Saturday. The guild board could approve the contract Sunday and encourage writers to return to work the next day, according to people close to the negotiations.

Studio executives and TV producers have been preparing for that day for the last two weeks, hoping to salvage the remainder of the television season by quickly revving up production to bring back some popular TV shows that have been languishing in repeats or were taken off the air.

“Everyone is motivated to get back to work as quickly as possible,” said Jonathan Littman, president of Jerry Bruckheimer Television, which produces “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation” and “Amazing Race,” among other shows, for CBS. “They want to begin producing as many original episodes as they can.”

Movies that were derailed by the strike also could lurch back, including high-profile projects such as Columbia Pictures’ “Da Vinci Code” prequel “Angels & Demons” and Warner Bros.’ “Shantaram,” starring Johnny Depp.

Films are blessed with long lead times, and last summer studio executives accelerated development and production schedules in anticipation of a strike. As a result, the movie industry was not as hard hit by the Nov. 5 work stoppage as broadcast TV.

Production shut down in December and January, after the supply of TV scripts had been depleted. That compromised the season, which officially ends May 21.

It will take four to six weeks and tens of millions of dollars to ramp up TV production in dozens of cavernous soundstages in Los Angeles, Burbank and New York, and not every prime-time series will immediately return to the air.

“It’s not just flipping a switch and having everything come right back on,” said Barry Jossen, executive vice president of production for ABC Studios. “There are a lot of factors and considerations that go into these decisions. We are trying to determine the amount of material that was finished before the strike started, the creative status of the show and the broadcast schedule needs.”

Only about 10 to 20 prime-time network programs are likely to return this spring with fresh episodes, including some of TV’s biggest hits, such as “Grey’s Anatomy” on ABC and “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation” on CBS. Some viewers might not see new episodes of their favorites until fall — at the earliest. Shows with complex plots, large casts and complicated production elements, such as NBC’s “Heroes” and Fox’s “24,” are expected to roll over to next season.

Studio executives say they can’t justify the increased costs of ramping up production for every program halted by the strike. It would cost the studios millions of dollars extra — an average $200,000 more an episode, according to one estimate — to produce an abbreviated run for each series. Crews must be rehired, sets need to be rebuilt, and the costs of production would be spread over a smaller number of episodes.

Some struggling shows might not be worth saving. Shelling out millions more for marketing campaigns to try to relaunch an iffy drama could spell sudden death for such programs as NBC’s “Bionic Woman” and CBS’ “Cane,” industry executives predicted.

Television executives are vowing to use the disrupted TV season as an opportunity to do what they have talked about for years: change their decades-old rituals in an effort to contain costs in an era when audiences have declined and technologies such as the Internet and digital video recorders have changed the way people consume media.

“TV executives haven’t been sitting around thumbing their fingers during the strike; they have been giving a lot of thought to how they run their business,” Littman said. “We’re seeing some industrial Darwinism as the business changes.”

For decades, broadcast television has operated on a rigid schedule. In the fall, writers submit hundreds of scripts to the networks, which place orders for their top prospects in January and February; producers hire staffs and shoot pilot episodes from February through April in what’s typically known as pilot season.

Networks are running out of time for a full-blown development season for next fall, which could give shows such as “Cashmere Mafia” on ABC and “Reaper” on the CW a new lease on life.

Networks plan to scale back the number of pilots they order this year. In recent years, as many as 120 comedy and drama pilots were produced for ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox and the CW, all competing for the vacant slots on their prime-time schedules. Last year the networks ordered about 40 of the pilots to series.

“Broadcast networks can no longer spend tens of millions of dollars every year creating dozens of pilots that never see the light of day,” NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker said.

Of all the pilots produced last year, only one, “Samantha Who?” on ABC, became a bona fide hit. That’s a lousy batting average in an industry that can spend $8 million for an hourlong pilot.

TV executives hope to usher in year-round development and adopt more of a cable-TV programming schedule, where the focus is on ordering fewer shows and introducing them throughout the year.

“We are looking at the long-term health and stability of the business for multiple seasons,” ABC Studios’ Jossen said.

TV comedies will be the first to go back into production. Multi-camera shows such as “Two and a Half Men” on CBS and “Back to You” on Fox are likely to resume production within the next two weeks. Single-camera comedies, such as NBC’s “The Office” and “My Name Is Earl” and CBS’ “How I Met Your Mother” also are expected to quickly shift back into gear.

The creator of “My Name Is Earl,” Greg Garcia, said he would like to get his writing staff back together Monday. Production should begin within two weeks after the strike ends, Garcia said, because the writers had left two completed scripts that were not shot and had outlined several other episodes.

“We’re kind of ahead of the game, so we can mobilize quickly,” Garcia said. “But it all remains to be seen.”

Established dramas could begin production in March.

Howard Gordon, the show runner for “24″ on Fox, said he has been busy contacting his writing staff.

He said production could feasibly resume six weeks after the writers boot up their laptops. But the drama’s unique storytelling device, with each of the 24 one-hour episodes equaling a day in the life of terrorist-fighter Jack Bauer, has complicated matters.

“24″ typically runs from January to May, but Fox delayed the premiere indefinitely rather than airing an incomplete season consisting of eight episodes that were on hand.

Fox has not decided when the show will return, Gordon said, but is considering three scenarios: airing 12 episodes as soon as possible and returning in the fall for the last 12, running all 24 episodes in the fall or waiting to premiere in January 2009.

There won’t be room for every show on the schedule. Some scripted programs lost their time periods to replacement reality shows, as “Chuck” did on NBC to “American Gladiators.”

At the FX cable channel, two shows felt the immediate brunt of the strike. Executives decided this week not to pull the plug on the second half of the season for “Dirt” and “The Riches.” Both shows had completed seven episodes of what would have been 13-episode seasons when the labor stoppage forced production to halt in December.

Even if the writers could go back to work next week, the network concluded they would not have enough time to complete the second halves of the seasons before May, when a slew of scripted programming is expected to return to the air, making the landscape that much more competitive. FX has not decided whether to pick either program up for a third season.

Dmitry Lipkin, creator of “The Riches,” said he was disappointed but understood his sacrifice: “My issues don’t hold a candle to what the guild is trying to achieve,” he said.

Will Scheffer, co-creator of HBO’s “Big Love,” said he and the other writers were in the midst of drafting the first six episodes of the show’s third season when the strike was called.

“The forced downtime changes your creative mandate in a way that never would have happened had there not been a strike,” Scheffer said. “In the shower, you get new ideas. We’ll revisit all the scripts. There will be some minor changes and maybe a few major changes that we didn’t expect that presented themselves.”

As for the strike itself, Scheffer declared it a success.

“It’s going to establish the writers’ position in Hollywood as being a little bit more substantial,” he said. “I think we showed there is an importance to the work, to scripts. That’s a huge aspirational thing.”

In the short term, he said:

“No one came out of the strike completely victorious. We all came out limping and bleeding.”

– By Meg James, Matea Gold and Maria Elena Fernandez

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark